Platform

Cyber Twins Platform (CTaaS)

A cyber twin is a security-focused digital model of your environment designed to validate changes, run realistic incident exercises, and test risk controls safely—before you touch production.

What is a cyber twin?

  • A security and resilience twin of your OT/IT environment (not just a visualization).
  • Built to simulate failure modes, attacker paths, and operational impacts.
  • Used for tabletop exercises with telemetry, change validation, and control evidence.
  • Designed for availability-first operations: safe testing with measurable outputs.

When cyber twins are most valuable

  • Pre-commissioning for SCADA upgrades and remote access changes
  • Validating segmentation and access rules (zones/conduits) without downtime
  • Testing incident response playbooks for OT realities
  • Risk testing for third-party connections and vendor integrations
  • Training operators and analysts with realistic scenarios

How it works

Architecture and evidence alignment

We model assets, dependencies, and data flows—then map controls to evidence aligned to IEC 62443 concepts (zones/conduits, documentation discipline) and common governance expectations.

Reference architecture (high level)

  • Asset ingestion: inventory, topology, configs, and operational dependencies.
  • Model layer: zones, conduits, identity boundaries, and trust relationships.
  • Simulation layer: scenarios for failure modes, attacker paths, change impacts.
  • Evidence & reporting: control mapping, artifacts, KPIs, executive summaries.
  • Continuous updates: keep the twin aligned as assets and configurations change.

Controls focus (examples)

  • Segmentation validation and rule testing
  • Remote access hardening scenarios
  • Backup/restore and recovery-time simulations
  • Account lifecycle and privileged access tests
  • Supply-chain and third-party connection risk testing

FEATURE

Built for realistic validation

Not just a diagram: cyber twins produce measurable outputs for leadership and operators.

Real-time simulation

Validate changes against operational constraints; test “what-if” safely.

Tabletop exercises with telemetry

Run scenarios with outputs tied to assets, dependencies, and playbooks.

Risk testing & change validation

Pre-check segmentation, remote access, and vendor connectivity changes.

Evidence generation

Map controls to artifacts for audits, RFPs, and risk committees.

Pricing

CTaaS tiers (indicative)

Pricing varies by infrastructure size, complexity, and data ingestion needs. Annual ranges shown are typical.

Foundation

$50K–$150K/yr

  • Initial asset/topology model
  • 2–4 scenarios (remote access, ransomware, segmentation)
  • Quarterly evidence reports

Operational

$150K–$350K/yr

  • Expanded environment coverage
  • Monthly scenario testing
  • Control mapping and executive KPIs
  • Training exercises with teams

Enterprise

$350K–$500K/yr

  • Multi-site / multi-domain modeling
  • Integrated reporting and governance artifacts
  • Dedicated scenario engineering and enablement

Outcomes

Customer success metrics

Cyber twins translate security work into measurable risk reduction and readiness outcomes.

Change risk reduction

25–50%

Fewer unplanned outages and rollbacks due to pre-validation and realistic testing.

Exercise realism

3x

Tabletops become operationally relevant when tied to assets, telemetry, and playbooks.

Evidence readiness

Weeks → days

Faster audit/RFP responses with reusable, structured artifacts.

Incident readiness

Higher confidence

Teams practice scenarios with concrete steps and measurable outputs.

R&D

Research and validation commitment

We invest in continuous scenario engineering, validation methods, and operational realism—so exercises and simulations remain credible and measurable.

What we invest in

  • Scenario libraries mapped to common OT/IT/ET attack patterns
  • Measurement: readiness metrics, detection fidelity, and response time reduction
  • Safety-aware simulation design: no disruption to production systems
  • Repeatable evidence artifacts for governance, audits, and RFPs

How we maintain integrity

  • Change control for model updates and scenario versions
  • Transparent assumptions and limitations
  • Exercises facilitated with operations and safety constraints
  • Post-exercise debrief with measurable actions and owners

Integration

GIS infrastructure mapping integration

Add geographic context to cyber risk: sites, service areas, and dependencies—so leaders understand “where” and “who” is affected.

Site-level impact

Link incidents and scenarios to substations, pump stations, plants, and remote sites for faster triage.

Service continuity view

Visualize dependencies between networks, physical assets, and services to understand cascading failure risk.

Executive reporting

Communicate risk in plain language: what’s impacted, what to do next, and what evidence supports decisions.

See a cyber twin demo tailored to your environment

We’ll map a sample scenario (e.g., ransomware on an engineering workstation) and show what outputs leaders and operators receive.

Scroll to Top